Vote In New Mexico? What For?

Early voting has begun in New Mexico for municipal elections, culminating on November 4, Election Day. Now we will hear our Democrat propaganda media here tell us about the importance of voting and how every vote counts and on and on and on.

Well whoop-de-do.

In this state, all they need us Republicans, conservatives, and independents for is to legitimize the Democrat dictatorship we live under here. In the recent special session called by the governor, the Democrat majority in the legislature could have just as easily peed in the face of every elected Republican as ignore them. It was an embarrassment to watch as pre-written laws were easily ratified but I think the Republicans in the Legislature showed they have very little pride left in themselves. Not that they could do anything about it.

But the Democrats have used our tax money for the past 90 years to bribe themselves into perpetual office with welfare dollars and programs that do the work and thinking for the average New Mexican. You can’t fight that kind of cotton candy. The people of New Mexico were born with their hand out and, by God, they’re going to die with their hand out.

Yes, I know our brave military heroes fought for our vote, fought for our freedom but when you live in a one-party state, whose populace seeks only their own comfort, you wonder if it was worth it. So I say let this election be 100 percent for Democrats or whatever their computers are programmed to give them.

Pardon my cynicism but I've earned it. Voting in New Mexico is a waste of gas, a waste of time, and a waste of concern.

            © Clyde James Aragon

Jimmy Kimmel vs. Alex Jones

The big uproar over Jimmy Kimmel and the TV show suspension he received after falsely claiming the Charlie Kirk murderer was a MAGA supporter reminds me of what happened to Alex Jones.

Jones, whom I might remind you, was the creator of Infowars, a website built on vitamin supplements and conspiracy theories. Well, in the aftermath of the Sandy Hooks Elementary School shooting in Connecticut back on December 14, 2012 in which 20 people were massacred by a madman, Jones, on his radio show, claimed that this massacre had been made up, that it was completely false.

The parents of those children and adults killed that day got pretty damned angry with his statements. So angry that they sued him for defamation and won $4.2 million in compensatory damages and $45.2 in punitive damages. A separate case netted a near million dollar judgement for the Sandy Hooks families. Infowars and Alex Jones went on to bankruptcy.

Looking back at the Jones’ case, Jimmy Kimmel’s reckless lie about assassin Tyler Robinson being a MAGA supporter seems to have left Kimmel and his employer, ABC News, open to the same kind of defamation lawsuit by Charlie Kirk’s widow. And not only Kimmel, but many prominent people from news media pundits to celebrities with a microphone could feel her wrath.

Whether she does sue or lets it go will be up to her but there seems to be some interesting similarities in the two events.

            © Clyde James Aragon

Planned Parenthood As A Cost-Cutting Measure

As reported earlier in this blog, the really-really great State of New Mexico has had second thoughts over the cost of their upcoming Free Universal Childcare giveaway program. Fearing it might break the bank and take funds away from important state projects like wasting money on Hollywood movie tax credits or paying to bring in out-of-state jobs with taxpayer money, a brilliant scheme was hatched to make everyone happy while not doing a darn thing for New Mexico.

As the Republicans in Congress had finally grown enough spinal vertebrae to stop funding Planned Parenthood and were no longer going to pay to keep their marvelous abortion clinics going, the Democrats in New Mexico, under the ever-spending Governor Michell Lujan Grisham, decided to make up the loss of this federal largesse and keep the butcher stables open with state money.

So brilliantly, New Mexico can now give free childcare while reducing the number of children.

Yet another win-win idea brought to you by the Democrats of New Mexico.

            © Clyde James Aragon

Socialist New Mexico

Forget Socialist Zohran Mamdani the mayoral candidate in New York, Michelle Lujan Grisham, the Democrat governor of New Mexico, has decided to one up Communist Mamdani by creating yet another welfare program for NM. This time Universal Childcare beginning November 1^st. Through the power of Democrat magic, the program will deliver what parents seem unable to provide for their progeny - babysitting. But it’s free and buys Democrat votes, so who cares.

Making sure there’s plenty of money all around, the building block of Communism will dictate, er encourage, employers to pay their employees $18 an hour. Why the state couldn’t just pay parents the $18 an hour and cut out the middle man, who knows. But it’s free and buys Democrat votes, so who cares.

But, my God, the local TV stations here have drives to give school kids shoes, coats, clothing, and toys. The Public Schools feed them breakfast and lunch. They give them laptops. They give them musical instruments if they want to take band. What, really, do parents do anymore? And most importantly, how can a kid have any respect for a mom and dad who can't even fry them an egg for breakfast or take them down to Walmart to buy them a pair of cheap sneakers? Parents have become no more that disinterested bystanders who somehow know how to fill out government forms. But it’s free and buys Democrat votes, so who cares.

Parents should be embarrassed with themselves but since they've made their 90 years of Democrat-run moocherism an acceptable way of life here in the Land of Enchantment, it means nothing to them any more. But it’s free and buys Democrat votes, so who cares.

We need to change the Zia symbol on our state flag to the outstretched hand. But it’s free and buys Democrat votes, so who cares.

            © Clyde James Aragon.

The Phony Political Violence In New Mexico

In an attempt to scare up sympathy for Democrats following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, bomb threats were supposedly sent on Thursday September 11 to two politicians in Santa Fe: New Mexico Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth and New Mexico House Majority Leader Reena Szczepanski. So of course the local media went wild pretending that these were actual threats here in Democrat-controlled New Mexico.

Sorry but I don't believe a single word of this. Given how corrupt the Democrats are in this state, I think this was just a convenient way for them and the Media to get Charlie Kirk's murder off the front page of newspapers and the TV screens of our local stations and to throw a little MeToo sympathy the Democrats way.

This wasn’t done by vengeful Republicans. Republicans are, for the most part, hardworking people. They’re at work or looking after their kids or checking in on aging parents or doing the many things that have to be done to keep busy lives going. They don’t have the energy to spend on politics. They don’t have the time to waste on frivolous gestures like phony bomb threats.

I’d say that, no, this was a sham operation from the Democrats themselves designed to garner attention and spread fear during the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation, cynically ameliorating the sadness being felt by ordinary people and especially young people. They wanted to take the eyes of America off of this murdered man and his grieving family, away from the true villains here: the assassin, hate-spewing Democrat politicians, and the ever-eager-to-please Democrat Party Propaganda Media. And on 9-11 of all dates. You can’t get much colder than that.

A good man has been silenced and a knife thrust through the hearts of a wife and children.

This shouldn’t be a time for the Democrat Party to pretend to be martyrs.

            © Clyde James Aragon

The Assassination Of Charlie Kirk As Told By My Local Newspaper

 The Albuquerque Journal’s front page story on the murder of Charlie Kirk didn’t impress me one bit. The entire story could have been boiled down to one paragraph of who, what, when, and where but rather than do that or issue a mea culpa on the Journal’s MeToo mind-swaying daily Democrat propaganda that surely contributed to this death, this paper has chosen to defend itself with a two-author behemoth article that incorporates everyone from Solomon Pena to Nancy Pelosi’s husband. In fact, I’d say the writers of the article moved so quickly away from Charlie Kirk that they could have blamed political violence on the extinction of the dinosaurs, as well.

Nowhere, though, do the authors bring up the transgender murderers of late or mention that, as the FBI revealed, the bullet casings in Kirk’s killer’s rifle had transgender and anti-fascist remarks etched on them. I guess when you’re cherry picking assassins, you forget things like that.

What gets me, though, is the rather insincere and expected concern of our New Mexico Congressional Democrat delegation with their typical ‘opposition to political violence’ refrain. Hell, Democrats have been killing Republicans since Abraham Lincoln (he was the U.S. president during the Civil War in case you went to public school). I wish they really meant what they said.

Another thing that got to me was calling Kirk controversial and conservative. I remember when believing in God put you in the mainstream of America. Now it’s considered controversial by today’s atheistic editorial staffs whose beliefs lie more in the worship of their bank accounts above any supreme deity. Where did the churches of America go wrong?

But I guess it was necessary to end the article with the Gotcha! statement of Kirk being for the Second Amendment and then, ironically, being assassinated with a rifle. What does that have to do with anything? He probably believed in brushing his teeth, too, and there he was, with spinach still in his teeth from lunch, as he lay dying. You could have ended that screed with that poignant observation and made a ringing endorsement for dental hygiene at the same time.

Given the monstrosity we witnessed, the authors should have stuck to a one-paragraph wrap-up.

            © Clyde James Aragon

A Reply To A New Mexico Democrat Legislator

My reply to an op-ed by New Mexico Legislator Marianna Anaya which appeared in the June 27th Albuquerque Journal:

It was most entertaining to read New Mexico Democrat Representative Marianna Anaya’s column over New Mexico Republicans not sending out words of condolence over the murder of two Minnesota legislators their silence, of which, would have shocked her Republican grandmother. While some might view this article as a disguised tirade against the Republican Party, I am thrilled at the glimpse we’ve been given into the mind of a New Mexico Democrat lawmaker.

While it may have been heartless and  inconsiderate of Republicans, I didn’t see a great outpouring of sympathy from Democrats and Progressives in New Mexico when Steve Scalise was shot and wounded by a left-wing extremist during a Republican Congressional Baseball Game practice session. Nor have I seen the flowers sent by Ms. Anaya and her Democrat friends to the funerals of  Kayla Hamilton, Jocelyn Nungaray, Rachel Morin, or Laken Riley - all killed by the illegal aliens the autopen regime allowed into this country.

But I don’t understand why anyone would expect words of sympathy from the nearly-extinct New Mexico Republican Party. Nearly-extinct because New Mexicans are literally bathed in Democrat propaganda from the media here. Nearly-extinct because most jobs here are Democrat-controlled sinecures. Nearly-extinct because who is listened to when half the population walks around with nose rings fashioned from Welfare dollars.

I know Trump has a few billionaire friends like Elon Musk, a man who worked for free doing Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Lujan’s job trying to weed out wasteful spending and reaped nothing but opprobrium and burned  Tesla dealerships for his trouble. But Democrats also have billionaire friends like Mark Zuckerberg who pumped Zuckerbucks into our elections to try and buy votes, New York’s Michael Bloomberg who tried to tax sugary sodas, or anti-American George Soros whose Leftist spending would turn us into the envy of Venezuela. They did a lot of pocket padding themselves.

What a nonsensical statement she makes that ‘people’ are dying from being unable to access abortion care. Aren’t these ‘people’ actually women? And what about the dead unborn child? We had over a million abortions in this country last year according to the Guttmacher Institute yet Anaya writes as though unborn children are no more than day-old hamburger placed in the cooler clearance section of the grocery store. I don’t think her grandmother would have admired unfettered infanticide. Not if she was a real Republican.

Ms. Anaya easily makes the statement that the cruel Republicans are gutting Medicaid without providing proof. What I’ve read and heard of the Republican plan is that they want to limit it to American citizens. Maybe I missed the memo but which foreign countries are currently giving us Americans free medical care? Or free housing? Or free anything?

Of course, when she blames Republicans for not wanting to work together, that only means one thing - they are not doing what she wants them to do. Given how Democrats have full control of the Legislature, bipartisanship is a meaningless word there although if you can add a few yes votes from Republicans, you can share the blame if anything goes wrong.

But what I despise most from any politician is them using my culture, our culture, to try to sell bad ideas. Ms. Anaya tries to make her views palatable by railing against Republican values but I think she should spend some time examining her own. Her grandmother would like that.

    © Clyde James Aragon